2005 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 2004 Suzuki XL7
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Suzuki XL7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Suzuki XL7 would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (331 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 2004 Suzuki XL7. (185 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 2004 Suzuki XL7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Suzuki XL7 weights approximately 170 kg more than 2005 Chrysler Crossfire.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (420 Nm) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Suzuki XL7. (250 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Suzuki XL7.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Crossfire | 2004 Suzuki XL7 | |
Make | Chrysler | Suzuki |
Model | Crossfire | XL7 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 2737 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 331 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 250 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 64 L |