2005 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 2005 GMC Canyon
To start off, both 2005 Chrysler Crossfire and 2005 GMC Canyon were released in the same year (2005). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP) has 40 more horse power than 2005 GMC Canyon. (175 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 2005 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Canyon weights approximately 405 kg more than 2005 Chrysler Crossfire.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (310 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 GMC Canyon. (252 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 GMC Canyon.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Crossfire | 2005 GMC Canyon | |
Make | Chrysler | GMC |
Model | Crossfire | Canyon |
Year Released | 2005 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 2770 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 175 HP |
Torque | 310 Nm | 252 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 102 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1392 kg | 1797 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.4 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 72 L |