2005 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 2006 Toyota Ractis

To start off, 2006 Toyota Ractis is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler Crossfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler Crossfire would be higher. At 3,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine.

Because 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Chrysler Crossfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Ractis, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (420 Nm) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Ractis. (158 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Ractis.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Chrysler Crossfire 2006 Toyota Ractis
Make Chrysler Toyota
Model Crossfire Ractis
Year Released 2005 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3195 cc 1299 cc
Horse Power 340 HP 0 HP
Torque 420 Nm 158 Nm
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1780 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]