2005 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Pajero is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler Crossfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler Crossfire would be higher. Both 2005 Chrysler Crossfire and 2010 Mitsubishi Pajero are equipped with a 3,199 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2010 Mitsubishi Pajero. (163 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 2010 Mitsubishi Pajero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mitsubishi Pajero weights approximately 148 kg more than 2005 Chrysler Crossfire.
Because 2010 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Chrysler Crossfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mitsubishi Pajero (373 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler Crossfire. (310 Nm). This means 2010 Mitsubishi Pajero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler Crossfire.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chrysler Crossfire | 2010 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Crossfire | Pajero |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3199 cc | 3199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 373 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 98.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 105 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 17.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1392 kg | 1540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1880 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 88 L |
