2005 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 2010 Tata Nano
To start off, 2010 Tata Nano is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler Crossfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler Crossfire would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 2010 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 2010 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 824 kg more than 2010 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (311 Nm) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Tata Nano. (48 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chrysler Crossfire | 2010 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Chrysler | Tata |
| Model | Crossfire | Nano |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3196 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 311 Nm | 48 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1424 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1495 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2230 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 37 L |
