2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 2,425 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 1363 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Because 1965 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager (218 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1965 Seat 600 | |
Make | Chrysler | Seat |
Model | Grand Voyager | 600 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2425 cc | 767 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 218 Nm | 47 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1938 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2010 mm |