2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2000 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Ranger would be higher.
Because 2000 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2000 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Grand Voyager | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 172 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
