2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2009 Ford Transit Connect
To start off, 2009 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford Transit Connect. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2009 Ford Transit Connect | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Grand Voyager | Transit Connect |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Panel Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3300 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 172 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1820 mm |
