2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2009 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2009 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 3,301 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager (172 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2009 Proton Gen-2. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 2009 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager (278 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2009 Proton Gen-2 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Proton |
| Model | Grand Voyager | Gen-2 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
| Engine Size | 3301 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 172 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 278 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2610 mm |
