2005 Chrysler Neon vs. 1992 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Neon is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Neon (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1992 Ford Tempo. (97 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Neon should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Ford Tempo weights approximately 25 kg more than 2005 Chrysler Neon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Ford Tempo (171 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler Neon. (154 Nm @ 4950 RPM). This means 1992 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Neon | 1992 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Neon | Tempo |
Year Released | 2005 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 154 Nm | 171 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4950 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2540 mm |