2005 Chrysler Pacifica vs. 2003 MG TF
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Pacifica is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MG TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MG TF would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Pacifica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Pacifica (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 2003 MG TF. (114 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Pacifica should accelerate faster than 2003 MG TF. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler Pacifica weights approximately 846 kg more than 2003 MG TF. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 MG TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 MG TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Pacifica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Pacifica (332 Nm) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG TF. (145 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler Pacifica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chrysler Pacifica | 2003 MG TF | |
| Make | Chrysler | MG |
| Model | Pacifica | TF |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 332 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2016 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 50 L |
