2005 Chrysler Pacifica vs. 2010 Ford E-250
To start off, 2010 Ford E-250 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler Pacifica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler Pacifica would be higher. At 4,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-250 (265 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler Pacifica. (251 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler Pacifica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler Pacifica weights approximately 218 kg more than 2010 Ford E-250.
Because 2005 Chrysler Pacifica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford E-250. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Pacifica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 339 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Pacifica | 2010 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Pacifica | E-250 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Crossover | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 339 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2068 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4717 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1702 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2824 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 72 L |