2005 Chrysler Pacifica vs. 2010 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler Pacifica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler Pacifica would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Pacifica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler Pacifica. (251 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler Pacifica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler Pacifica weights approximately 102 kg more than 2010 Mazda CX-9.
Because 2005 Chrysler Pacifica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mazda CX-9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Pacifica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler Pacifica. (339 Nm). This means 2010 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler Pacifica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chrysler Pacifica | 2010 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | Pacifica | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Crossover | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 273 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2068 kg | 1966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 5075 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1935 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1727 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2875 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 10.7 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 76 L |
