2005 Chrysler Pacifica vs. 2011 Ford E-150
To start off, 2011 Ford E-150 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler Pacifica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler Pacifica would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Pacifica (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2011 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Pacifica should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford E-150 weights approximately 446 kg more than 2005 Chrysler Pacifica.
Because 2005 Chrysler Pacifica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Ford E-150. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Pacifica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford E-150 (387 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler Pacifica. (339 Nm). This means 2011 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler Pacifica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chrysler Pacifica | 2011 Ford E-150 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Pacifica | E-150 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 339 Nm | 387 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2165 kg | 2611 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 5504 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2017 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 2085 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3505 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 10.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 125 L |
