2005 Chrysler Pacifica vs. 2012 Acura TL
To start off, 2012 Acura TL is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler Pacifica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler Pacifica would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Pacifica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Acura TL (305 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler Pacifica. (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler Pacifica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler Pacifica weights approximately 304 kg more than 2012 Acura TL.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Acura TL (370 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler Pacifica. (339 Nm). This means 2012 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler Pacifica.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Pacifica | 2012 Acura TL | |
Make | Chrysler | Acura |
Model | Pacifica | TL |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Crossover | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 370 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2104 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4928 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.8 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 70 L |