2005 Chrysler Pacifica vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler Pacifica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler Pacifica would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Pacifica is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler Pacifica weights approximately 653 kg more than 2012 Volvo C30.
Because 2005 Chrysler Pacifica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Volvo C30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Pacifica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chrysler Pacifica | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
| Model | Pacifica | C30 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Crossover | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 253 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2104 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 60 L |
