2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser vs. 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho
To start off, 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho. (78 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser weights approximately 268 kg more than 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser (188 Nm @ 4150 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho. (118 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser | 1982 Matra-Simca Rancho | |
Make | Chrysler | Matra-Simca |
Model | PT Cruiser | Rancho |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 78 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 188 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4150 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 76.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1132 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 60 L |