2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser vs. 2000 Toyota GT1
To start off, 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota GT1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota GT1 would be higher. At 2,425 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser (220 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 2000 Toyota GT1. (85 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota GT1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser weights approximately 1000 kg more than 2000 Toyota GT1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Toyota GT1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Toyota GT1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser (320 Nm) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Toyota GT1. (125 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Toyota GT1.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser | 2000 Toyota GT1 | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | PT Cruiser | GT1 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2425 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 125 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 93.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 72.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 8.9:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1130 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2810 mm |