2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser vs. 2004 Mazda B3000
To start off, 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser (180 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2004 Mazda B3000. (155 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda B3000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser weights approximately 54 kg more than 2004 Mazda B3000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser (285 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda B3000. (244 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda B3000.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser | 2004 Mazda B3000 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | PT Cruiser | B3000 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 244 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 9.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1564 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.1 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 74 L |