2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser vs. 2005 Nissan Armada
To start off, both 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser and 2005 Nissan Armada were released in the same year (2005). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser. (139 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 453 kg more than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser. (332 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser | 2005 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | PT Cruiser | Armada |
Year Released | 2005 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2425 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 522 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1935 kg | 2388 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.9 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 106 L |