2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser vs. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport

To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser would be higher. At 4,197 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (400 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 250 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser. (150 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser.

Because 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (570 Nm) has 346 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser. (224 Nm). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser 2008 Land Rover Range Rover Sport
Make Chrysler Land Rover
Model PT Cruiser Range Rover Sport
Year Released 2005 2008
Body Type Hatchback SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2425 cc 4197 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 150 HP 400 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 5750 RPM
Torque 224 Nm 570 Nm
Drive Type Front 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4290 mm 4980 mm
Vehicle Height 1610 mm 1910 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 57 L 104 L