2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser would be higher. At 2,425 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser (150 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2012 Volvo C30. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2012 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 44 kg more than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | PT Cruiser | C30 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2425 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 101 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1407 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 60 L |