2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser vs. 2013 BMW X1
To start off, 2013 BMW X1 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW X1 (238 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser. (155 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW X1 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 BMW X1 weights approximately 77 kg more than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 BMW X1 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 BMW X1 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 BMW X1 (350 Nm) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser. (224 Nm). This means 2013 BMW X1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser | 2013 BMW X1 | |
Make | Chrysler | BMW |
Model | PT Cruiser | X1 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 238 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 350 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10:01:00 |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1613 kg | 1690 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4484 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2044 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1545 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.1 L/100km | 6.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 63 L |