2005 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1952 Fiat 8V
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Fiat 8V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Fiat 8V would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Sebring (145 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1952 Fiat 8V. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1952 Fiat 8V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 509 kg more than 1952 Fiat 8V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1952 Fiat 8V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Fiat 8V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Sebring (217 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Fiat 8V. (145 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Fiat 8V.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Sebring | 1952 Fiat 8V | |
Make | Chrysler | Fiat |
Model | Sebring | 8V |
Year Released | 2005 | 1952 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2429 cc | 1901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 61.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1439 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 79 L |