2005 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1965 Jaguar MK X
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Jaguar MK X (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler Sebring. (150 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler Sebring. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 367 kg more than 2005 Chrysler Sebring. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Jaguar MK X is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Jaguar MK X. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler Sebring. (217 Nm). This means 1965 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Sebring | 1965 Jaguar MK X | |
Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
Model | Sebring | MK X |
Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2425 cc | 3781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 360 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1523 kg | 1890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 63 L |