2005 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1981 Suzuki Cervo
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Suzuki Cervo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Suzuki Cervo would be higher. At 2,737 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Sebring (200 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1981 Suzuki Cervo. (26 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1981 Suzuki Cervo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 1090 kg more than 1981 Suzuki Cervo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1981 Suzuki Cervo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Suzuki Cervo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Sebring (262 Nm) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Suzuki Cervo. (52 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Suzuki Cervo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Sebring | 1981 Suzuki Cervo | |
Make | Chrysler | Suzuki |
Model | Sebring | Cervo |
Year Released | 2005 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2737 cc | 539 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 262 Nm | 52 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1625 kg | 535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 3200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1220 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2040 mm |