2005 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2002 Seat Inca Kombi
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Seat Inca Kombi would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Sebring (145 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. (59 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 404 kg more than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Sebring (217 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi. (107 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Seat Inca Kombi.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chrysler Sebring | 2002 Seat Inca Kombi | |
| Make | Chrysler | Seat |
| Model | Sebring | Inca Kombi |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2429 cc | 1391 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 107 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1439 kg | 1035 kg |
