2005 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2004 MG TF
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MG TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MG TF would be higher. At 2,737 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Sebring (200 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 2004 MG TF. (114 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2004 MG TF. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 364 kg more than 2004 MG TF. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 MG TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 MG TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Sebring (258 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MG TF. (145 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chrysler Sebring | 2004 MG TF | |
| Make | Chrysler | MG |
| Model | Sebring | TF |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2737 cc | 1588 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 80.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1464 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 50 L |
