2005 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2004 Rolls-Royce 100
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rolls-Royce 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 would be higher. At 8,998 cc (16 cylinders), 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 weights approximately 1219 kg more than 2005 Chrysler Sebring.
Because 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Rolls-Royce 100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Sebring | 2004 Rolls-Royce 100 | |
Make | Chrysler | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Sebring | 100 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2425 cc | 8998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 16 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 84.6 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1421 kg | 2640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 80 L |