2005 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2009 Dodge Dakota

To start off, 2009 Dodge Dakota is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Dakota (207 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler Sebring. (200 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler Sebring.

Because 2009 Dodge Dakota is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Dodge Dakota. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Sebring (262 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Dodge Dakota. (236 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Dodge Dakota.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Chrysler Sebring 2009 Dodge Dakota
Make Chrysler Dodge
Model Sebring Dakota
Year Released 2005 2009
Body Type Convertible Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2737 cc 3701 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 200 HP 207 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 262 Nm 236 Nm
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 87.9 mm
Engine Stroke Size 78 mm 100 mm
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4930 mm 5560 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1830 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1750 mm
Wheelbase Size 2700 mm 3340 mm
Fuel Consumption 8.4 L/100km 11.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 11.2 L/100km 14.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 61 L 83 L