2005 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2012 Honda Jazz
To start off, 2012 Honda Jazz is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Sebring (139 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2012 Honda Jazz. (118 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2012 Honda Jazz.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Sebring (188 Nm @ 4350 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Honda Jazz. (145 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2005 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Honda Jazz.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Sebring | 2012 Honda Jazz | |
Make | Chrysler | Honda |
Model | Sebring | Jazz |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 188 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4350 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.3 seconds | 9.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.4 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 42 L |