2005 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo
To start off, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo weights approximately 61 kg more than 2005 Chrysler Sebring.
Because 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Chrysler Sebring. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo (540 Nm) has 323 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler Sebring. (217 Nm). This means 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Sebring | 2013 Lamborghini Gallardo | |
Make | Chrysler | Lamborghini |
Model | Sebring | Gallardo |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 540 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 92 mm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1439 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4345 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1165 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.8 L/100km | 11.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 18.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 90 L |