2005 Chrysler Voyager vs. 1950 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 2,737 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1950 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Voyager | 1950 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
Model | Voyager | XK |
Year Released | 2005 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2737 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2600 mm |