2005 Chrysler Voyager vs. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 55 kg more than 2005 Chrysler Voyager.
Because 2005 Chrysler Voyager is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Voyager will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chrysler Voyager | 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
| Make | Chrysler | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Voyager | Starfire |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3301 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1765 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |
