2005 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2001 Holden HSV
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Holden HSV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Holden HSV would be higher. At 5,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Holden HSV is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Holden HSV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Holden HSV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Holden HSV (692 Nm) has 414 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler Voyager. (278 Nm). This means 2001 Holden HSV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler Voyager. 2005 Chrysler Voyager has automatic transmission and 2001 Holden HSV has manual transmission. 2001 Holden HSV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Chrysler Voyager will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Voyager | 2001 Holden HSV | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Voyager | HSV |
Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3299 cc | 5698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 278 Nm | 692 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |