2005 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Westfield XTR 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Westfield XTR 2 would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler Voyager. (120 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 1245 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2.
Because 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chrysler Voyager | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Westfield |
| Model | Voyager | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1685 kg | 440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2320 mm |
