2005 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Renault Clio (251 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler Voyager. (150 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 334 kg more than 2004 Renault Clio.
Because 2004 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Renault Clio (300 Nm @ 4650 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler Voyager. (224 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Voyager | 2004 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Voyager | Clio |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 251 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7150 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4650 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 11.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1416 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 60 L |