2005 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2004 Suzuki Aerio
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Suzuki Aerio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Suzuki Aerio would be higher. At 2,399 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Suzuki Aerio (155 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler Voyager. (150 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Suzuki Aerio should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 508 kg more than 2004 Suzuki Aerio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Voyager (224 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Suzuki Aerio. (206 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Suzuki Aerio.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Voyager | 2004 Suzuki Aerio | |
Make | Chrysler | Suzuki |
Model | Voyager | Aerio |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2399 cc | 2294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 206 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1242 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 50 L |