2005 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 3,299 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Voyager (172 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Voyager should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Chrysler Voyager has automatic transmission and 2010 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2010 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Chrysler Voyager will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Voyager | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Voyager | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3299 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 172 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2490 mm |