2005 Citroen C vs. 1990 Rover Metro
To start off, 2005 Citroen C is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Rover Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Rover Metro would be higher. At 1,761 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Citroen C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Rover Metro (75 HP) has 16 more horse power than 2005 Citroen C. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Rover Metro should accelerate faster than 2005 Citroen C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Citroen C weights approximately 95 kg more than 1990 Rover Metro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Rover Metro (117 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Citroen C. (116 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1990 Rover Metro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Citroen C.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen C | 1990 Rover Metro | |
Make | Citroen | Rover |
Model | C | Metro |
Year Released | 2005 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 1395 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 75 HP |
Torque | 116 Nm | 117 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 36 L |