2005 Citroen C vs. 2013 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Citroen C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Citroen C would be higher. At 5,800 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford Mustang (653 HP) has 594 more horse power than 2005 Citroen C. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2005 Citroen C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford Mustang weights approximately 865 kg more than 2005 Citroen C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford Mustang (856 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 740 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Citroen C. (116 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2013 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Citroen C.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen C | 2013 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | C | Mustang |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 5800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 653 HP |
Torque | 116 Nm | 856 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 105 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1425 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 61 L |