2005 Citroen C1 vs. 1942 Volvo PV 801-10
To start off, 2005 Citroen C1 is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 (85 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2005 Citroen C1. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 should accelerate faster than 2005 Citroen C1.
Because 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen C1 | 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C1 | PV 801-10 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1942 |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 3670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 85 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |