2005 Citroen C1 vs. 1962 Triumph Herald

To start off, 2005 Citroen C1 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 1,398 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Citroen C1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen C1 (53 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1962 Triumph Herald. (38 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C1 should accelerate faster than 1962 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Citroen C1 weights approximately 100 kg more than 1962 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Triumph Herald is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Triumph Herald. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Citroen C1 (132 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Triumph Herald. (83 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2005 Citroen C1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Triumph Herald.

Compare all specifications: