2005 Citroen C1 vs. 1966 Volvo 144

To start off, 2005 Citroen C1 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Volvo 144. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Volvo 144 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Volvo 144 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Volvo 144 (124 HP) has 71 more horse power than 2005 Citroen C1. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Volvo 144 should accelerate faster than 2005 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Volvo 144 weights approximately 410 kg more than 2005 Citroen C1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 Volvo 144 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Volvo 144. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Volvo 144 (167 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Citroen C1. (132 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1966 Volvo 144 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Citroen C1.

Compare all specifications: