2005 Citroen C1 vs. 1999 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2005 Citroen C1 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Dodge Charger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Dodge Charger would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Dodge Charger (321 HP) has 268 more horse power than 2005 Citroen C1. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2005 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Dodge Charger weights approximately 482 kg more than 2005 Citroen C1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Citroen C1 | 1999 Dodge Charger | |
| Make | Citroen | Dodge |
| Model | C1 | Charger |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1398 cc | 4700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 321 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 880 kg | 1362 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1310 mm |
