2005 Citroen C2 vs. 1980 Mazda 929
To start off, 2005 Citroen C2 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mazda 929 (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2005 Citroen C2. (64 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mazda 929 should accelerate faster than 2005 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mazda 929 weights approximately 75 kg more than 2005 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Citroen C2 (147 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Mazda 929. (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Citroen C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen C2 | 1980 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C2 | 929 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 73.8 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 88 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 55 L |