2005 Citroen C2 vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 2005 Citroen C2 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 1,397 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Citroen C2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen C2 (72 HP) has 25 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (47 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C2 should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Citroen C2 weights approximately 168 kg more than 1982 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen C2 | 1982 Renault 9 | |
Make | Citroen | Renault |
Model | C2 | 9 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 47 HP |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 169 km/hour | 138 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 822 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.2 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 38 L |