2005 Citroen C2 vs. 1996 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2005 Citroen C2 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Citroen C2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda Midge (67 HP) has 3 more horse power than 2005 Citroen C2. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 2005 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Citroen C2 weights approximately 23 kg more than 1996 Mazda Midge.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Citroen C2 (147 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Citroen C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen C2 | 1996 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C2 | Midge |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 147 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 972 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |