2005 Citroen C2 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Citroen C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Citroen C2 would be higher. At 4,014 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 2005 Citroen C2. (59 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 2005 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Ranger weights approximately 278 kg more than 2005 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Citroen C2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (323 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Citroen C2. (94 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Citroen C2 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | C2 | Ranger |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 4014 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 323 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 100.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 84.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1208 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.2 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 41 L | 74 L |