2005 Citroen C3 vs. 1962 DAF 750
To start off, 2005 Citroen C3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF 750 would be higher. At 1,124 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Citroen C3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen C3 (59 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1962 DAF 750. (31 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Citroen C3 weights approximately 391 kg more than 1962 DAF 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DAF 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Citroen C3 (94 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF 750. (57 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2005 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF 750.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Citroen C3 | 1962 DAF 750 | |
| Make | Citroen | DAF |
| Model | C3 | 750 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1124 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 31 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 94 Nm | 57 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 85.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 65 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 7.1:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1053 kg | 662 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2060 mm |
